Packet 5: Tossup 10

Note to moderator: Read answerline carefully. Note to Players: Description Acceptable. A 2005 article by James Ho about this right argued that Plyler v. Doe refuted Peter Schuck’s 1985 book on it. The (-5[1])1924 Snyder Act eliminated an exception to this right created by Elk (15[2])v. (-5[1])Wilkins. (-5[1])Jacob M. Howard attached an exemption reading “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” (15[1])to this (15[1])Jus (15[1])Soli (15[1])principle. (15[3])An (15[1])exemption (15[1])to this right (15[2])was held (15[1])to only apply to diplomats (15[1])by United States v. (15[1])(*) Wong Kim (10[1]-5[1])Ark. (10[3])Trump v. Barbara (10[2])concerns a 2025 Executive Order attempting (-5[1])to end this right for children (10[2])of (10[1])non-permanent (10[2])residents, (10[3])who are (10[1])often attacked (10[1])as “anchor babies.” (-5[1])For 10 points, the 14th Amendment grants what right to babies (10[1])born in the U.S? ■END■ (10[4]0[1])

Back to tossups

Buzzes

Summary