Round 5: Tossup 10

Note to moderator: Read answerline carefully. Note to Players: Description Acceptable. A 2005 article by James Ho about this right argued that Plyler v. Doe refuted Peter Schuck’s 1985 book on it. The 1924 Snyder Act eliminated an exception to this right created by Elk v. Wilkins. Jacob M. Howard attached an exemption reading “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” (15[1])to this Jus Soli principle. (15[1])An exemption to this right was held to only apply to diplomats by United States v. (*) Wong Kim Ark. Trump v. Barbara concerns a 2025 Executive Order attempting to end this right for children of non-permanent residents, (10[1])who are often attacked as “anchor babies.” For 10 points, the 14th Amendment grants what right to babies born in the U.S? ■END■

ANSWER: birthright citizenship [accept jus soli before mention; accept descriptions indicating that a person receives citizenship automatically if they are born in the U.S.; prompt on citizenship with “what right guarantees a method of obtaining citizenship?” before “born” is read; accept citizenship after “born” is read]
<Social Science - Other, Vikram Narasimhan> | VAULT II Packet 05
= Average correct buzzpoint

Back to tossups

Buzzes


Summary

TournamentEditionMatchHeardConv. %Power %Neg %Avg. Buzz
VAULT II at Georgia Tech2026-01-246100%17%33%82.00
Triangle Cup2026-03-132100%50%0%70.50
VAULT II at Eden Prairie HS2026-03-133100%0%33%102.33
VAULT II at McGill2026-03-134100%50%25%88.75
VAULT II at UCSB2026-03-135100%20%20%93.40
VAULT II Northern UK2026-04-243100%67%0%73.67
VAULT II Southern UK2026-04-244100%50%25%77.25
VAULT II at Harvard2026-04-304100%50%0%76.25
VAULT II at MINT2026-06-19580%20%20%102.00
VAULT II Stanford Online2026-07-178100%63%13%74.63